Page Content: There has been lots of talk about transformation, or the lack thereof, at Stellenbosch University (SU) lately. I want to provide the assurance that Maties is not the "racist institution" that we have been made out to be by some. That is not our policy, and we have also been working very hard to become more inclusive and welcoming to all in practice.
But, as much as it saddens me to say this, some of our students and staff members have had a different experience. This is clear from a number of incidents and also the Luister (or Listen) video on social media. I found it painful viewing, because I do not want any of my students to suffer. I am not going to defend the indefensible: discrimination, marginalisation, these things are wrong, whether consciously or subconsciously. I am sorry it happened, whether on campus or in town, and we have to fix things.
We have taken action against racism, but what is being raised by Open Stellenbosch and others go beyond individual acts. It speaks to structural issues, our institutional culture, whether everyone feels they belong here, that it is also their place.
We certainly want Maties to be a welcoming home to all. There was a time in the past when this University, along with others in our country, served a particular section of the population only. But that is long gone. We have moved from being a "whites only", "Afrikaans" university, to being a non-racial, multilingual national asset – proudly serving the whole of society.
Already in the year 2000, the University formally acknowledged "its contribution to the injustices of the past". That was an apology for apartheid, often repeated by me and my predecessors. At the same time, the University also committed itself to "redress and development".
In 1990, a mere 5% of our student body was black, coloured and Indian. Today, it is 38%, and we are aiming for a minimum of 50% by 2020. So, we have made progress, even though much remains to be done. We consider diversity an absolute requirement for excellence because it exposes us to a variety of people and ideas, which broadens the mind and enriches us.
In November 2014, Council placed English on an equal footing with Afrikaans as mediums of instruction for the first time. This was done so that neither language functions as a barrier to access; and so that both languages are used as instruments for success. The Minister of Higher Education and Training recently confirmed the validity of this framework, and we consider multilingualism an asset in today's global knowledge society.
We are now in the process of implementing our new language policy. And we acknowledge that there are practical problems – especially with bilingual classes and the use of simultaneous interpretation. Task Teams are investigating, and we will report back to Council and those who have submitted complaints and proposals. Neither of our two languages of instruction is being forced on anyone. Although, again, I am not invalidating the experience of those who feel differently.
We have reached a crucial moment in the history of Su. There seems to be a gap between our sincere intentions and the reality experienced by some. This calls for deep introspection, earnest dialogue and a concerted effort to make Stellenbosch the truly "inclusive, innovative and future focused" University we want it to be.
I have been promoting an open discussion since the start of my tenure in April. Meaningful dialogue requires mutual respect and a willingness to change. I remain committed to this, and we have issued an invitation to Open Stellenbosch afresh to engage in talks with Management.
On 1 September 2015 there were two significant developments. We had fruitful discussion with Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training. And a peaceful though spirited demonstration took place on our Stellenbosch campus by protesting students and staff members. We welcome robust discussion because universities are places of critical thinking and freedom of expression. However, that does not mean everything goes.
Earlier this year, a lecture and a career fair were disrupted, and an administration building briefly occupied. This was unacceptable, and an investigation that could result in disciplinary action in terms of codes of conduct applicable to all is underway. No-one is being victimised, and I am certainly not silencing protest. But I do have a responsibility to protect this institution – all its people and its property – against threats of violence. This is in line with a call by the Minister on all higher-education institutions in the light of destructive behaviour by protesters on some campuses.
What we must avoid at all cost is the danger of polarisation. As each side increasingly demonizes the other, compromise becomes more difficult. We must reach out to each other in the search for common ground instead of retreating into "us" and "them" camps.
We should not be surprised by the restlessness in higher-education nationwide this year. South Africa is still in transition, and the first born-frees have arrived on campuses – old enough to think for themselves and see the problems around them, and young enough to want to do something about it. But neither should we be alarmed. There is no problem with activism – as long as it does not degenerate into violence and destruction.
What I do find tremendously reassuring and inspiring is the conversations that are happening despite the current tensions – or maybe it is because of the troubles that Maties are stepping forward and doing their bit. I want to thank alumni, partners and friends of the University for their support – not blind, uncritical loyalty, but the kind of support that is based on a shared fondness of this University and its potential.
Both Council and Senate have publicly declared their commitment to transformation. The annual elections in representative student leadership structures have now been concluded, and a lot of effort is going into preparing them to help guide the honest discussion we need at this University. A wealth of work has been done for several years already to make the process of Stellenbosch becoming more diverse and integrated a positive one. Our Listen, Live and Learn initiative in student housing is a good example, an approach that is not restricted to a few units but permeates the whole system.
Significant steps are being taken to reinvigorate the process of change at Su. Transformation has been included in the restructured portfolio of Prof Nico Koopman, one of our Vice-Rectors. And a Transformation Office is being established, as well as a broader Transformation Committee. Also, to ensure that our journey of transformation is based on sound research, we will be establishing two Chairs for Transformation, Reconciliation and Justice.
And we have also allocated R70 million to diversify our staff body, especially at senior academic level. This is a big challenge, though we are not the only university in this position. There is a serious shortage of senior black academics nationwide, which we are helping to alleviate in the long run with our large output of master's and doctoral graduates from the designated groups.
Our journey of transformation is incomplete and imperfect, but we remain steadfast in our determination to go forward. That is the only way of creating a community of "social justice and equal opportunities for all" – as our mission states. Yes, we are at the moment facing challenges, but there are also many exciting opportunities. We must go forward, as I have no doubt we will, by fixing what is wrong and celebrating what is right – together.