Page Content: Are you still wondering whether the big bang really took place? And have you ever wondered what will happen with yummy marshmallows in a vacuum? These are all things that physics students not only think about, but make plans to figure out!
During this year's Physics information evening even Prof Hendrik Geyer, well-known physicist and director of the Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Studies (STIAS), stood amazed at what postgraduate students in physics can do with marshmallows – all part of the process of understanding the secrets of the universe of course.
Prof Geyer delivered the guest lecture 'Was there really a big bang?' during the Department of Physics information evening on Monday 19 May 2014. This was followed by an introduction to the department and some fun demonstrations by postgraduate students.
Was there really a big bang?
To wonder about whether something like the big bang really took place, is like wondering whether the Earth is round, says Prof Geyer.
"The big bang theory is a well-founded theory based on detailed observations and can be confirmed by means of controllable predictions. To wonder whether there ever was a big bang, is equivalent to wondering whether the Earth is round, or whether the Earth rotates around the sun – in both cases the evidence is overwhelming."
The story of the big bang begins with the birth of matter, time and space over 13.7 billion years ago. The established big bang theory cannot tell us anything about what happened before the big bang, simply because its mathematical framework is not adequate to address this question. But at the same time physicists are considering the possibility of 'cyclic big bangs', especially within the context of string theory.
Prof Geyer says there are five "exhibits" or elements which on their own and together support the big bang theory, starting with Olbers' paradox: "The fact that the night sky is not as bright as day, implies that the universe cannot be both infinitely large and infinitely old. In other words, the universe had a starting point and is still expanding because of the fact that space-time 'stretches' out. Edwin Hubble observed this fact in the 1920s already when he investigated the light of Milky Way galaxies moving away from us."
If the universe was static and infinitely old, then the night sky would have been glowing with all the light of all the stars.
Another exhibit is the fact that we are observing the after-glow of the big bang in the form of cosmic background radiation, as observed by Penzias en Wilson in 1964. The big bang theory has also been able to pinpoint the relative number of photons in the universe and these values are supported by means of independent observations. The theory also explains in detail how observable structures like planets, starts and Milky Way galaxies form and develop under the influence of gravity.
Each of these elements is intimately bound together. In the words of the famous American physicist Richard Feynman, "Nature uses only the longest threads to weave her patterns, so each small piece of her fabric reveals the organisation of the entire tapestry". This means that even though one or more of these elements will undergo refinement or changes as new data become available, the bigger picture – that of the big bang – remains unchanged.
Typical of science, though, there is always the possibility that there might be other explanations: "So even though we now accept the big bang theory as the most plausible explanation of how our observable universe came into being, it doesn't stop us from looking around," he explains.
Physicists have, for example, been talking about multiverses for some time now, and our universe will be but one of them (as described here on campus by Prof Leonard Susskind). The idea of a cyclic universe (and therefore several big bangs) is supported by several prominent physicists, including Sir Roger Penrose, the well-known British physicist and philosopher of science who has also spoken about this idea here in Stellenbosch.
But according to Prof Geyer there are not yet sufficient measurable data for these ideas to afford them the same status as the big bang theory. "There are, however, new schools of thought, like the idea that the laws of physics or science itself can change with time," he adds.
More about physics and marshmallows
After the lecture the audience made the acquaintance of Prof Kristian Müller-Nedebock (who uses theoretical physics to measure and describe the properties of soft and squishy biological organisms, like the mitochondria in your blood cells); Prof Heinrich Schwoerer (whose group uses ultrafast laser spectroscopy to research the movement of atoms, which are a million times smaller than what the human eye can observe); and Prof Shaun Wyngaardt (who spies on the atomic nucleus with all kinds of sophisticated equipment at the iThemba LABS).
For the rest of the evening the postgraduate students, under the direction of Rikus Groenewaldt, entertained the audience with demonstrations of how light energy can excite molecules so that we can observe it with dark light (Andrea Rohwer, MSc student in laser physics); the noise made by a Geiger monitor when it picks up radiation (Hein Fourie, MSc student in health and radiation physics), and what happens to marshmallows in a vacuum (Bart Smit, MSc student in experimental laser physics).
Dr Christine Steenkamp's children, Nicolaas (5) and Marguerite (7), were brave enough to demonstrate afterwards that vacuumed marshmallows are still edible! Dr Steenkamp lectures in laser physics in the physics department.